Elza Irdalynna
We
live in a world where intimacy and privacy exists in a different and
wider scope in this day and age. We share copious amounts of information
about ourselves for the world to see: our family, friends, professional
lives, personal lives, even our daily meals are uploaded to the
internet.
Many of us subscribe to the social media community for various,
innocent reasons. Be it to keep in touch with loved ones, to bridge
geographical gaps, to promote our business, or simply to keep a digital
anthology of our lives.
However, not many people are aware of the fact that social networking
services such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and so on possess the
rights to our information – pictures, videos, statuses.
And under programs such as PRISM by the NSA in the United States,
they can be forced to give out our information under the all too wide
umbrella of national security.
Even if you do not own a Facebook account, your email, bank details,
browsing history, even purchasing records, are under unwarranted
surveillance.
Take the soon to be launched Xbox One for example, and their ‘always
online’ feature. While it may seem cool to players that they can
activate their consoles by voice recognition, they fail to understand
that this means ‘someone’ is always listening.
Their webcam feature is also always online, and so customers are under 24 hour surveillance.
If Malaysians believe that this only affects America, think again.
Technologies used for monitoring programs such as PRISM can be used
worldwide. Anyone who is assumed to be an enemy of the state can be
traced and put on record. This is not limited to suspected terrorists.
The NSA is watching everyone, every phone call, every message, everything.
It is a lie to claim this is merely to ensure national security. If
this was the case, the US government would have been able to stop the
Boston Marathon bombing before it occurred. After all, the duo
responsible used the most unsophisticated methods of attack.
The Big Brother phenomenon is not alien in our country. How many of
us are surprised at receiving emails or text messages of holiday wishes
by the Prime Minister? Who gave the government our contact information?
Police state
Recently, Melissa Gooi was arrested for sedition because she
“insulted the Agong” on her Facebook account. Specifically, she
expressed her opinion of the King’s speech, not of the King himself, and
suggested the speech was written by someone else, perhaps of the
right-wing group.
She also expressed this under the protection of her freedom of
expression, enshrined in our constitution. She also made these comments
on her personal Facebook page, which, despite it being a public network,
was intended for those she knew and trusted.
Perhaps she had a higher privacy setting, but her friends and friends of her friends did not.
And so, due to either parties that are easily offended, or persons
using her as a political tool, her opinion was viewed as a threat to the
sanctity of the King. Despite the fact that she had not directly broken
any laws, this will forever taint her record.
Her friends who commented on that status are also jeopardized. Not
only is this a violation of her freedom of expression, we have now
allowed online surveillance to be enough evidence to arrest and imprison
someone.
Slowly, but surely, we will become a police state like North Korea,
and the government will lead the people to believe that it is for their
own good.
If Richard Nixon was forced to resign because of the Watergate
Scandal, and if Rupert Murdoch was publicly crucified for the phone
tapping by the News of the World, why are we allowing governments to
carry out spying against us?
It is obvious this is no longer to protect our safety. It is to control us, to restrict our freedom and rights.
Dictators in the Middle East use this very system to illegally
arrest, torture and kill not only those who dare hold an opposing
opinion of them, but also their families and friends.
Any personal data can and have been used against these innocent people to force them into doing what their government wants.
While we may claim that our democratic country wouldn’t succumb to
such tyranny, how can we be so sure? As it stands, our elections are not
transparent, our government is blatantly corrupt, and our constitution a
joke. Can we guarantee that things will not go out of hand?
Future laws and technologies when abused, such as it is under NSA,
could threaten our lives. If we do not unite and demand our rights to
privacy, we will live in a world where one is considered guilty until
proven innocent.
You are not allowed to have an opinion, to follow your own beliefs,
or to conduct your personal lives the way you want to. You are not a
citizen. You are a first and foremost a suspect, and to prove otherwise,
forced to live a naked life.
It’s not about hiding anything. It’s about what’s right and wrong.
The government has no business in our personal lives, especially when
they themselves practice zero transparency.
We cannot isolate ourselves from this injustice, because if it doesn’t stop in America, it will plague the rest of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment